I believe Sunstein and other public information gatekeepers see themselves acting in service to their country, to protect the republic from actual threats and pernicious influence of conspiracy crackpots.
Recognize these forms of dishonesty when you see them. With that recognition, you gain emotional resources to speak articulately when you encounter forceful people who practice these types of dishonesty. At a minimum, you can understand how their minds operate, and use that understanding to evaluate their arguments.
So the comparison to Santa Claus was just a means of ridicule after all. Snickering goes well with that. Let people know that you consider your opponents beneath consideration. That means you don’t have to argue with people who disagree with you. You don’t want to dignify their positions. You don’t expect your opponents to listen to you anyway, any more than you listen to them.
Can you guess the The Jeffersonian’s most viewed post, among almost five hundred articles? It is Why World Trade Center 7 …
Shawn Hamilton published an interesting article titled Rethinking Conspiracy in the Foreign Policy Journal (October 27, 2014). Here is an excerpt: The terms “conspiracy …
Suppose 9/11 truth became part of the contest between the two major political parties. The partisanship wouldn’t be pretty, nor …
Alright, Christmas is coming, so it’s time to take a look at Cass Sunstein’s argument, if you can call it …
You should see how David Ray Griffin takes apart Cass Sunstein’s work on consipiracy theories. Griffin’s book is titled Cognitive …
I have a couple of things to say about David Ray Griffin’s work this afternoon. Then I have to get …
